node.patagonia

1 model offers · · Public identity

Demo activity · 24 hours ending 17 Oct 2026 · All activity and timing figures are simulated.

Gross consumption

$3.76

Before protocol fees · simulated

Tokens processed

18.21M

12.85M input · 5.37M output

Completed requests

4,226

4,245 total requests

Complete delivery

99.55%

19 failed requests

Settled consumption

Gross inference consumption · 24 hours

Protocol fees $0.11Seller net $3.65

Requests

Hourly · UTC

Completed and failed requests · 24 hours

4,226 completed19 failed

Tokens processed

Input + output

Token volume across all model offers · 24 hours

Input 12.85MOutput 5.37M

Time to first token

Milliseconds

Simulated timing distribution · 96 timings

Median 667 msP95 1089 ms

Current paired buyer rates per million tokens, including the initial 3% P2P fee. Savings compare input and output separately with each model’s reference tariff. Activity and latency follow the selected period.

Illustrative prices and simulated activity for node.patagonia
Model	Input / 1M	Output / 1M	Tokens	Gross consumption	Completed	Delivery	Median TTFT	Audit
Gemma-3-27BSeen in snapshot	$0.132Expired	$0.385Expired	18.21M	$3.76	4,226	99.55%	667 ms	Not audited

Snapshot visibility is separate from simulated delivery. Timings use the same offer samples as model details. Real session prices must be bound to the accepted signed offer.

Service reputation

Live score · Not rated

Demo service metrics · 24 hours ending 17 Oct 2026. No reputation registry, signed receipts or live probe feed connected.

Complete delivery · demo

99.55%

4,226 of 4,245 requests

Probe reachability · demo

98.61%

142 of 144 synthetic probes

Billing agreement · demo

95.83%

115 of 120 comparisons within tolerance

Buyer addresses · demo

Distinct synthetic addresses · not unique people

Service reliability

Each rate has its own sample and denominator · percentage, not a reputation score

DeliveryReachabilityBilling agreement

Streaming speed

Independent synthetic streaming samples · tokens per second, higher is faster

Median 73 tok/sP95 85 tok/s

Median / P95 first token 667 / 1089 msExpired without settlement 0 / 41 closed channels · 0.00%Streaming sample size 96

What would inform reputation

Initial signal weights · normalization and penalties still need calibration. No overall score is calculated from these fixtures.

Billing honesty25%: Comparison agreement is an example, not proof of honest billing.
Complete delivery20%: Uses the same request totals as this profile and Network.
Buyer-weighted history20%: Distinct addresses are not independent people or recognized demand.
Age & recent activity15%: Only a 30-day demo window; no verified first-seen date.
Speed10%: First-token latency and streaming speed are separate measurements.
Availability10%: Probe reachability is a sampled connection rate, not uptime.

Identity and optional stake do not raise the service score. Model audit evidence remains separate. These metrics do not establish routing priority, rewards or a verified-provider badge.

Service history

1 of 1 examples

Aggregate synthetic observations, not complaints, sanctions or incidents attributed to a real operator

Date · UTC	Observation	Sample detail	Interpretation
2026-10-17	Billing comparison	5 of 120 demo comparisons outside tolerance.	Example for review

Out-of-tolerance comparisons and expired channels do not prove fraud or trigger a demonstrated penalty.

View service chart data

Period · UTC	Complete / requests	Reached / probes	Matched / billing checks	Delivery	Reachability	Billing agreement	Median tok/s	P95 tok/s
2026-10-17 00:00	95 / 95	5 / 6	4 / 5	100.00%	83.33%	80.00%	74	85
2026-10-17 01:00	101 / 101	5 / 6	4 / 5	100.00%	83.33%	80.00%	70	86
2026-10-17 02:00	110 / 110	6 / 6	4 / 5	100.00%	100.00%	80.00%	65	81
2026-10-17 03:00	124 / 125	6 / 6	4 / 5	99.20%	100.00%	80.00%	71	82
2026-10-17 04:00	95 / 95	6 / 6	4 / 5	100.00%	100.00%	80.00%	67	83
2026-10-17 05:00	118 / 118	6 / 6	5 / 5	100.00%	100.00%	100.00%	73	84
2026-10-17 06:00	147 / 148	6 / 6	5 / 5	99.32%	100.00%	100.00%	68	79
2026-10-17 07:00	176 / 177	6 / 6	5 / 5	99.44%	100.00%	100.00%	69	85
2026-10-17 08:00	159 / 160	6 / 6	5 / 5	99.38%	100.00%	100.00%	75	86
2026-10-17 09:00	187 / 188	6 / 6	5 / 5	99.47%	100.00%	100.00%	65	76
2026-10-17 10:00	219 / 220	6 / 6	5 / 5	99.55%	100.00%	100.00%	66	82
2026-10-17 11:00	245 / 246	6 / 6	5 / 5	99.59%	100.00%	100.00%	72	83
2026-10-17 12:00	222 / 223	6 / 6	5 / 5	99.55%	100.00%	100.00%	68	84
2026-10-17 13:00	239 / 240	6 / 6	5 / 5	99.58%	100.00%	100.00%	74	85
2026-10-17 14:00	254 / 255	6 / 6	5 / 5	99.61%	100.00%	100.00%	69	80
2026-10-17 15:00	262 / 263	6 / 6	5 / 5	99.62%	100.00%	100.00%	70	86
2026-10-17 16:00	222 / 223	6 / 6	5 / 5	99.55%	100.00%	100.00%	71	82
2026-10-17 17:00	222 / 223	6 / 6	5 / 5	99.55%	100.00%	100.00%	66	77
2026-10-17 18:00	219 / 220	6 / 6	5 / 5	99.55%	100.00%	100.00%	67	83
2026-10-17 19:00	210 / 211	6 / 6	5 / 5	99.53%	100.00%	100.00%	73	84
2026-10-17 20:00	159 / 160	6 / 6	5 / 5	99.38%	100.00%	100.00%	69	85
2026-10-17 21:00	153 / 154	6 / 6	5 / 5	99.35%	100.00%	100.00%	75	86
2026-10-17 22:00	147 / 148	6 / 6	5 / 5	99.32%	100.00%	100.00%	70	81
2026-10-17 23:00	141 / 142	6 / 6	5 / 5	99.30%	100.00%	100.00%	66	82

Service methodology & limitations

demo-service-v1 · Request delivery and first-token timings reuse the existing shared example activity. Probe, billing, channel, address and streaming fixtures are independent synthetic cohorts, not reconstructed from revenue. A billing match means within an invented ±1-token tolerance; it is not an independently recounted, authenticated receipt. Aggregate rates use summed numerators and denominators, distinct addresses use a set union and speed percentiles use pooled raw samples. Daily/hourly totals reconcile.

Only aggregate examples are public: no buyer wallets, private receipts, prompts, responses or IPs are exposed. No live rating, service guarantee, fraud judgment or ERC-8004 feedback is produced. Reputation needs authenticated measurements, recognized buyer history, published normalization and penalty rules before a real score can be shown.

Public identity & evidence

Provider-supplied information

Service reputation

Not rated

Insufficient verified measurements. Stake does not raise the score.

Model audits

No evidence connected

Seals belong to individual model offers.

View audit coverage

Optional stake

Not available

No stake program connected. This is separate from identity and reputation.

Node profile

Public information supplied by the provider

Website: example.comExample site
Payment network: ·
Payout address: 4u2n1yGV4vAr8KpgwFnYBgndFxWVvFr4kjkxYMYSkPkk

Example address; it may have no Explorer account. Node image and website are provider-supplied profile information, not proof of identity.

ERC-8004 identityNot verified

8004 on · sample registration

Registry network
Agent ID / asset: 7iTXsM7vpFyxVV2z8ysGvLkmqUSaGZVQztUADspYDnMn
Registry program: 8oo4dC4JvBLwy5tGgiH3WwK4B9PWxL9Z4XjA2jzkQMbQ
Owner address: G8et7JtkE1epDNt97PNCh4ePHEckBmgKpHwYKSG2mhZK

Sample asset and owner addresses. No registry lookup or ownership check is performed. About the Solana registry

Catalog listings are illustrative. Live payments, service measurements and signed audits are not connected. Data sources